'6 Marriages, 6 Divorces, Asked For Maintenance From The Seventh One Too', The Judge Was Stunned To Hear Such A Story Of The Woman.
'6 Marriages, 6 Divorces, Asked For Maintenance From
The Seventh One Too', The Judge Was Stunned To Hear Such A Story Of The Woman.
There is no gender discrimination in the world of
crime. There the criminal can also be a woman. But the perceptions in the
society are often different. Often we get to hear the news of atrocities on
women in marriage relations. In such a situation, the talk of gender equality
is raised loudly. Something strange is happening about this in a viral video.
In this video, a judge is trying to confirm in a case that the woman who has
applied for divorce has earlier taken maintenance by divorcing six men after
marrying them.
In this strange case, when the woman reached the court
for divorce for the seventh time, the judge was also surprised to know this.
This incident is being told of karnataka. The judge asks if this is her seventh
husband. He also asks if a case has been registered against all of them under
section 498a.
When asked by the judge, it was found that she had
lived with each husband for one year and six months before filing for divorce
after starting legal proceedings.and after this, the judge said that the woman
was tampering with the law. The judge fixed the date of the next hearing and
asked all the previous husbands of the woman to appear with detailed
information. This case has surprised many people.
And this video is very much discussed on social media.
Although nowadays many such videos of the court are released on social media,
in which the discussion of the judge and the lawyer is heard. But this video
and the case could not be formally confirmed.
But users could not stop themselves from giving their reactions on the viral video. Some people are praising the judge's thorough investigation of this matter. At the same time, some people argue that if he was a boy instead of a girl, he would not have been allowed to go out of the court and instead he would have been sent to jail. Raising questions on gender equality in the caption of the video, "jai ho equality" is written.
